They are POJOs. There's no common superclass or interface required as
all communication with framework happens via the owning object.
Andrus
On Dec 29, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Also, can embeddables be just POJOs? If not, maybe we mark them with
some
interface?
2009/12/29 Andrey Razumovsky <[email protected]>
Just started to play with embeddables. I mapped one as shown in
this guide,
but then at class generation classes with embeddables are not
checked by
default and I see warning "attribute.name" contains invalid
character: .
near them
What is that? As far as I can tell, if checked manually, classes get
generated correctly
--
Andrey
