On 5/01/10 7:28 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

1. I was wrong about the "Ubuntu" group including Hadoop* machines.
Ubuntu = minerva + vesta. So both build configurations are explicitly
clustered across the group.

2. Both minerva and vesta contain identical
~hudson/.cayenne/connection.properties files. We need to manually keep
those in sync. At the same time we don't really need one on
hudson.zones.apache.org.

I was thinking that in the longer term we could get rid of that file for Hudson 
purposes and just hardcode some defaults right into a file within svn. After 
all, HSQLDB is hardcoded in.

3. Cayenne-30 does not support cayenneTestConnection property and I am
not comfortable patching it from trunk at this point. And as Ari
noticed, using cayenne.test.connection notation doesn't play well with
Hudson (I can't imagine why, but I can confirm this finding).

It is because Hudson uses Groovy for scripting. And Groovy gets confused by 
variable names with dots.

 As a
result we can't run 3.0 on Hudson with Derby or H2. So I removed those
options. Now it runs with Java 5 & 6 on HSQLDB only.

I think that is a good option for now.


4. Cayenne-trunk on the other hand can support specific DB's (see #2
above), and so it does. Derby runs without test failures BTW. However
I've seen occasional test failures that can be attributed to race
conditions in the tests (those happen on local machines as well). One
day we are going to track them down.

5. Builds themselves are pretty fast. Usually the slowest step is SVN
checkout.


Hey, maybe if we are game we could try building against Harmony. I wonder if 
that would work...

Ari


--

-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Reply via email to