On 21/01/10 9:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
It doesn't have to be, although from slow voting on RC2, I guess as a
practical matter doing yet another RC is too painful for everyone
involved :-/

Or else we could agree that this is "only" a release candidate. That is, everyone on the 
PMC doesn't have to verify the entire package in detail. We could treat the voting as a formality 
the PMC needs to go through and say "we trust that Andrus is doing the right thing and there 
is nothing going into svn which looks like a problem". That way we could release RCs more 
often (which would be useful), and still spend much more time reviewing the final 3.0 release 
package.

Ari

--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Reply via email to