On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
I've always thought of EJBQL as of sort of OOP-analogue of SQL. So while those thinks look logical and work in SQL, why shouldn't they in EJBQL.. So I'm not fully convinced, but if you wish (?), I'll revert that change
Thanks for doing that. The way I see the EJBQL evolution in Cayenne is that in 3.0 it is String-only, JPA-compatible. In 3.1+ it becomes an API or String-based (CQL extends EJBQL), JPA compatible, but with Cayenne extensions.
Andrus
