Great. We'll take another look at CAT-1367 on Monday.
Andrus
On Jan 24, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
OK, now with 1371 behind, I'm +1 to release and fix 1367 later
(right now
have no more time)
2010/1/22 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Will try to on the weekend - but I cannot promise... Actually
CAY-1371 is
a
major bug and is must-have for 3.0. As for CAY-1367, I've already
looked
at
it, fix will not be easy, but we'll just need to leave one primary
field
from an entity in FROM statement if it exists in group by. IMO we
need to
fix 1371, and RC2 can be built without 1367 as it is rather rare
case and
can be workarounded (by not specifying group-by path in FROM
statement)
Somehow overlooked CAY-1371. Definitely need to fix it.
Looking forward for fetch joins! :)
Yeah, that one is important.
Andrus
--
Andrey
