Agreed. While we do need a cgen version, we don't need it to be part of the file names or the directory names. It can be in the comments. I also don't think we need to support cgen 1.1 anymore.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote: > >> If we really need to show cgen version, i'd rather we do it in templates' >> comments (##this is template for use with cgen 1.2), not in directory >> name. > > Keep in mind that we may have more than one template version in one distro > simultaneously, just like we do in Cayenne 3.0 (although I wish we didn't). > > Until we face this situation again though, I have no problem if we get rid > of the version folder. > > Andrus >
