I think at some point we will reorg the unit tests to be based on a DI stack. Need to think about a good design for this...

In the meantime, can you be more specific - which class will have that injectable var? Maybe it can be initialized without injection?

And on a general note, in Cayenne not all stack objects are created via injection. Either by design (there has to be some level of granularity at which DI stops and where an object can decide on its own on how to initialize its composite state) or because we haven't switched them yet. DI enabled are the high-level stack objects (DataDomain), and common user extension points, such as DbAdapter or DataSourcFactory.

Andrus


On May 27, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

No. in main Cayenne code, I want to add injectable var and put code that injects default implementation in CayenneServerModule. But that wouldn't work at least for unit tests, since injection does not get invoked there.
What's the best way to fix the situation?

2010/5/27 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>

Are we still talking about unit tests? Can you give an example of what you
are trying to accomplish?

Andrus


On May 27, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

So does that mean I never can rely on injecting, and must always have a
insurance of default injectable interface implementation in my code?

2010/5/27 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>

Not to the unit tests inheriting from CayenneCase and friends. Unit tests
were always bootstrapped in their own way, even in the past (mostly for performance reasons). However if you need to define mock services, etc.
via
IoC this can be done with a great deal of flexibility. E.g. see
DataDomainProviderTest.java, DefaultDataSourceFactoryLoaderTest.java and
other tests in the same package.

Andrus




On May 27, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

Hi Andrus,


Are new 3.1 DI "modules" (CayenneServerModule) bound to Cayenne
bootstrap
process? At least, I don't think they are when we're running JUnit
tests.
Or
otherwise, how to "turn on" injecting?

--
Andrey





--
Andrey





--
Andrey

Reply via email to