> ...... Let's > add to that list from time to time when needed, but I think it is useful to > have a place to acknowledge people who contribute.
Like this idea more. But there is still problem: >.... we don't have a clear criteria of whom to list in this > section, and IMO should treat everybody equally by removing this section. Also like idea about treating everybody equally. I suggest to use this list for everybody who submitted a single patch which was approved and committed to SVN. Also we can add some documentation contributors, those who describe at least some peace of functionality (like page size). > Also, I think we probably would have a list a mile long if we included > everyone who made a minor contribution. And it will be cool! It will show that project is alive, that community is great and small regrets to everyone who have contribute. Evgeny. 2010/8/25 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]>: > I would say that we should remove it for the reasons you stated. > Also, I think we probably would have a list a mile long if we included > everyone who made a minor contribution. > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > wrote: >> http://cayenne.apache.org/contributors.html >> >> I was thinking we should remove the list of names from the "Other >> Contributors" section in the bottom. This list worked well when Cayenne was >> 2 years old, now that it is 9, it no longer makes any sense. The problem is >> not about the listed folks, but rather that there are many more people who >> did something comparable for Cayenne (like submitting a single patch, or >> reporting and investigating a non-obvious bug). >> >> So in other words we don't have a clear criteria of whom to list in this >> section, and IMO should treat everybody equally by removing this section. >> >> Thoughts? Objections? >> >> Andrus >
