I hadn't updated since I did the H2 tweak, so I just updated to pick up your change and any others. Same story:
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 3 minutes 49 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 04 16:22:58 EDT 2010 [INFO] Final Memory: 101M/309M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Not sure what is going on with Hudson at the moment. mrg On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: > Just tried with -DcayenneTestConnection=h2, which I hadn't used before: > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 4 minutes 17 seconds > [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 04 16:17:03 EDT 2010 > [INFO] Final Memory: 101M/309M > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Just reproduced the errors locally running like this: >> >> mvn clean install -DcayenneTestConnection=h2 >> >> Could you doublecheck the property name activating the "h2" profile? It is >> different between 3.0 and 3.1 branches (above is a 3.1 version per >> http://cayenne.apache.org/running-unit-tests.html ). The new syntax is due >> to some stupid Hudson limitations on dots in the property names. >> >> Andrus >> >> On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> >>> yeah, I'd think so: >>> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>com.h2database</groupId> >>> <artifactId>h2</artifactId> >>> <version>1.0.64</version> >>> <scope>test</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> >>>> I haven't seen any more Hudson failures since then. >>> >>> All my today's commits resulted in the same failures. Build #373. >>> >>> Andrus >>> >>> On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Andrus, >>>> >>>> I saw that error e-mail, but when I built and ran tests I didn't get >>>> the errors. Wouldn't the version of H2 to use when running tests be >>>> specified in the pom.xml and in theory should be the same? Is this >>>> still happening? I haven't seen any more Hudson failures since then. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> mrg >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Mike (mrg)! >>>>> >>>>> Wonder why we are getting a bunch of Hudson H2 errors? Is this a >>>>> different H2 version compared to what you've tested against? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Andrus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [spew deleted] >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
