I am fine either way. Just wanted to point out that we probably don't care about the issues with JPA tests at all.
Andrus On Oct 14, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 13/10/10 6:58 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> Hmm, wonder if we should svn cp branches/STABLE-3.0/ >> branches/STABLE-3.0_with_jpa/ and then remove JPA stuff from 3.0. Will make >> the builds faster for one thing. > > I don't think that is necessary. Hudson can be a bit inconsistent if builds > happen on a new slave, but it is still useful to know about possible issues > rather than mask them by removing the tests. > > > Ari > > > -- > --------------------------> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >
