But yeah, even the concept of UUID (a String representation of ObjectId) should be enough to make it a hit (and motivate us to move it to the core).
Andrus On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > The main building blocks (DataChannelFilter and lifecycle annotations) are > already in the core. The rest of it is still evolving, so I just feel more > comfortable to assign it an "extension" status at this point (maybe implying > it can go away, or is supported differently than the core). In the future we > may decide to move it to the core. > > Andrus > > > On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> On 27/01/11 2:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>> So I am suggestion to move cayenne-mixin to the main development tree from >>> sandbox (under the name "cayenne-lifecycle") and include it in 3.1 releases >>> as a separate jar. This will allow our users to get the "official" builds >>> of cayenne-lifecycle, and hopefully won't create release scheduling >>> conflicts between the core and lifecycle. >> >> The concepts appear to be extremely useful, but I'm not understanding why >> they don't just go into the core jar. Is it because they still need extra >> work? Or do they interfere with the existing lifecycle events in some way? >> >> Ari >> >> >> -- >> --------------------------> >> Aristedes Maniatis >> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >
