>> I'll need to ask about the preferred Apache way to solve (2). I wonder if >> something like StackOverflow might be a reasonable alternative to a wiki. >> More FAQ than documentation, but perhaps useful for us. > > Wiki is good for creating arbitrary unstructured content, such as mock specs, > board reports and what not. IIRC Confluence will still be supported as Wiki > (but not as a site engine). So hopefully (2) can stay as is (something to > check).
StackOverflow is currently in discussion on the Members mailinglist. Some people think SO is good, but some are very unenthusiastic for different reasons on SO. I have tried out SO the last couple of weeks and must say I don't like it very much. I find it hard to follow the stuff I am interested in. People are speaking about the vote down/up concept, but I don't see a benefit in it. I think the idea to use Apache CMS for the website and docbook for docs is a very good idea. just my 2 cents Cheers
