Ari, Since I have a bit of time right now, I guess I'll proceed with preparing the release. But I don't want it look like I am pushing it through when there are still unresolved concerns. So if we want to cancel it for this or some other reason, let's resume this discussion.
Andrus On Sep 12, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > I suggest CAY-1210 goes in after M3. It has a potential of introducing lots > of regression issues and will require some effort to setup the unit tests. So > my vote is to go ahead with M3 (which is long overdue) and commit CAY-1210 to > trunk once the release is tagged, so that we can test it at a slower pace. > > Andrus > > > > On Sep 12, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > >> On 12/09/11 5:14 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>> I think now we are fully ready to release M3. The maven plugin bugs are >>> fixed, the POM is setup to follow the Apache process using >>> maven-release-plugin, and we have ~ 2 dozens of new features waiting to be >>> released (hats off to Dzmitry on all of these things). >>> >>> Now I'll need to find time to actually assemble the release and start the >>> vote. >>> >>> Andrus >> >> If we could get CAY-1210 into this M3 build I'll do some testing. Do you >> want to merge the code or should I? >> >> Ari >> >> -- >> --------------------------> >> Aristedes Maniatis >> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >> > >
