Wouldn't it be harder (on us and users) to fix it later (3.2+) than now?

mrg

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah good catch. You are absolutely right.
>
> One caveat though. Since we are in Beta now, we should follow our own 
> self-imposed rules and avoid changing the API (property renaming being such a 
> change IMO).
>
> I guess we can fix the String value for "ROP_SERVICE_TIMEOUT_PROPERTY" 
> constant, but also keep the old value around as a deprecated "synonym". I.e. 
> if a user defines a value for "cayenne.rop.service.timeout", we should load 
> that into "cayenne.rop.service_timeout" internally. I know it is a pain...
>
> Should probably Jira that too so that it is recorded in RELEASE-NOTES.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2012, at 10:44 PM, John Huss wrote:
>
>> I'm updated my app to the most recent 3.1 and I think I found one property
>> name is wrong in org.apache.cayenne.configuration.Constants:
>>
>> cayenne.rop.service.timeout
>>
>> Seems to be inconsistent with the other properties, which all have an
>> underscore after "service", for example:
>>
>> cayenne.rop.service_url
>>
>> cayenne.rop.service_username
>>
>> cayenne.rop.service_password
>>
>>
>> If that sounds right I will change it to use an underscore.
>>
>> John
>

Reply via email to