On 8/11/12 6:56pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I didn't touch 1.2, 2.0, 3.0 layout. So no need for redirects. I strongly support the
notion that we shouldn't be changing the existing well-publicized URLs without a cause.
And if we do, always provide a 301 redirect (see "content/.htaccess"). But this
is not the case here.
The new scheme starts with 3.1 release. Among other things the new CMS freed us from the
directory and file naming imposed by Confluence Autoexport, so I figured the URLs might
follow the menu hierarchy for the docs. Also "unflattening" the top directory
structure seems like a good thing for our own sanity.
Personally I don't know it is more sane (although I hate underscores). But I
think we *want* consistency. That is, if I'm looking at
http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/3.0/something
I'd like to be able to change the url to
http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/2.0/something
and have it work.
Ari
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
