On May 26, 2013, at 9:31 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote:
> Also, the three selects I mentioned are: SQLSelect[1].query(Artist.class, > "SELECT[2] * FROM Artists").select[3](context). That just seems like too > many selects to me, which is why I was suggesting alternatives. Good point about 3 selects. I am all for providing select clause builder, appending columns, etc. to eliminate #2. I guess the only reason for select #3 is to be symmetrical with the new ObjectContext.select method (as this is what is being called ultimately). Other than that I don't have objections for renaming it to "fetch". Also we have "selectOne"… I guess that would be "fetchOne" or something. A.
