Oh yes, I'd forgotten about that conversation. I'm going through now and 
replacing the calls in one of my apps with the 3.2 API: not sure if I'll put 
this into production yet, but I wanted to explore how the new API interacts 
with a real live application.

So far, it works really well. What was the decision about addOrderings, 
setPageSize, etc? I know we discussed them; was the consensus to go with a 
fluent style approach where they each return SelectQuery instead of void? I 
assume we can do that without changing the method names?

Ari

On 21/07/13 5:19pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
It didn't escape it, just that this is an evolving API. M1 has 
Cayenne.objectForSelect(..). This was removed just recently from trunk, 
replaced with ObjectContext.selectOne(..) per CAY-1848.

And once we have "select" versions for all the main queries in addition to 
SelectQuery and SQLSelect, we will also deprecate Cayenne.objectForQuery.

Andrus

On Jul 21, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <amania...@apache.org> wrote:
Is there a reason this one escaped the generification process in the new API in 
3.2M1? Was it an oversight or is there something tricky about this?

Ari

--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A



--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Reply via email to