I agreed with sticking with 3.2. Since there isn't a major architecture change 3.2 seems appropriate. The smaller version change makes it seem less scary to people considering upgrading.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > After this amount of time, I think renaming it will cause confusion > when projects which are currently running 3.2 pre-final find no > further 3.2 upgrades in the future. > > And we've set a new precedent with 3.0 and 3.1, so I think we're ok > continuing down this this path. > > > But I don't feel strongly enough that I'd vote against it. > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: > > There were some suggestions to rename 3.2 release to just 4. I think > this is a good idea, as historically each of our GA release was always a > major thing. No matter whether we incremented the version by 1 or by 0.1. > So just throwing this in here for a lazy consensus. > > > > Andrus >
