> J2EE 6 is still mainstream, and J2EE 7 is still relatively unsupported (J2EE > 7 is also only a 1.5 years old).
Does JEE version correlate with JDK/JRE versions? It never did in the past. And we are talking about JDK version here. Andrus > On Oct 26, 2014, at 9:46 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > > J2EE 6 is still mainstream, and J2EE 7 is still relatively unsupported (J2EE > 7 is also only a 1.5 years old). > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Platform,_Enterprise_Edition#Certified_application_servers > > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: > So quite a bit of time has passed since our last Java 7 discussion. Java 6 is > even more distant memory now. Of which I was reminded today after I upgraded > my laptop to Yosemite. My Modeler instance wouldn't start without installing > "legacy Java SE 6 runtime" (of course I quickly switched to Java 7 modeler > and all was good). So I suggest two things, both applying to Cayenne 4.0 (aka > 3.2) : > > 1. Make Java 1.7 a minimal requirement. > 2. If #1 meets any opposition, at least stop supporting Java 6 friendly > Modeler assembly on the Mac, which existence has no reasonable excuse anymore. > > Andrus > > > >
