> So are you thinking something like:
> Artist.ARTIST_NAME.contains("Van")?
yep.
> Also, what about
> case-insensitive?
Probably as a second true/false argument? I started to dislike the look of
"likeIgnoreCase" recently :)
Property.contains(string);
Property.contains(string, true);
Property.contains(string, false);
Andrus
> On Nov 21, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> I 'like' this.
>
> So are you thinking something like:
> Artist.ARTIST_NAME.contains("Van")? Also, what about
> case-insensitive?
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>> Another API idea that I just had while analyzing boilerplate code of the
>> client Cayenne apps. An argument to Property.like(..) (or second argument to
>> ExpressionFactory.likeExp(..)) requires a full pattern to match against. So
>> people would often write their own utility code to wrap a String in "%"
>> signs. Cayenne can easily take care of this via the following methods:
>>
>>
>> Property.contains(string);
>> // same as Property.like("%" + string + "%");
>>
>> Property.startsWith(string);
>> // same as Property.like(string + "%");
>>
>> Property.endsWith(string);
>> // same as Property.like("%" + string);
>>
>> In addition to saving the user from String concatenation, these new methods
>> can do proper symbol escaping, making "like" much safer to use.
>>
>> Andrus
>
