Technically, I was a +0, but that doesn't change the outcome. Thanks,
mrg On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Alex Kolonitsky < akolonit...@objectstyle.com> wrote: > I am closing the vote. We have the following tally: > > Michael Gentry (PMC) +1 > Aristedes Maniatis (PMC) +1 > John Huss (PMC) +1 > Andrus Adamchik (PMC) +1 > Mike Kienenberger (PMC) +1 > Alex Kolonitsky +1 > > So the vote passes and we officially have 4.0.M2 release. Congratulations > and thanks everyone! I'll push the release files and update the site. > > Best regards, > Alex Kolonitsky. > > > On Mar 12, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: > > > > Cool. I guess Alex who started the vote can wrap it up then at his > convenience then. > > > >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > wrote: > >> > >> Well, I did get it to build on OS X, but still not on Linux. I don't > want > >> to hold up the release needlessly when it seems a problem on my end, > but I > >> will try to resolve it when I have a chance. Sorry for the delays, just > >> have had a lot of interruptions/tasks. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> mrg > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Andrus Adamchik < > and...@objectstyle.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hey Mike, > >>> > >>> Do you need more time to check the release? While we do have all the > >>> needed votes already, I didn't want to close the voting thread if you > are > >>> still investigating. > >>> > >>> Andrus > >>> > >>>> On Mar 10, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I've still been unable to build on Linux, even with the changes Andrus > >>>> suggested. I can try Mac OS X tonight, but even if it builds there, > I'm > >>>> concerned about the failure on Linux until I can figure it out. > >>>> > >>>> mrg > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Mike Kienenberger < > mkien...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hey guys, > >>>>> > >>>>> We're still missing one more binding vote and it's been 12 days. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik < > and...@objectstyle.org > >>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Googling shows that putting '-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true' might > >>>>> help. We mention that in the dev guide actually, and just recently I > was > >>>>> wondering which one of the tests actually requires IPv4 vs IPv6 :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://cayenne.apache.org/dev/building-cayenne.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2015, at 9:50 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm consistently getting this test failure when trying to build: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Tests in error: > >>>>>>> DataRowStoreIT.testConstructorWithProperties:63 ยป CayenneRuntime > >>>>>>> [v.4.0.M2 Mar... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Tests run: 1456, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [INFO] Reactor Summary: > >>>>>>> [INFO] > >>>>>>> [INFO] Cayenne ........................................... SUCCESS > >>>>> [1.236s] > >>>>>>> [INFO] Cayenne Build Tools Parent ........................ SUCCESS > >>>>> [0.021s] > >>>>>>> [INFO] Cayenne License and Notice Bundle ................. SUCCESS > >>>>> [2.770s] > >>>>>>> [INFO] Common Unit Test Utilities ........................ SUCCESS > >>>>> [2.040s] > >>>>>>> [INFO] Cayenne Code Checkers ............................. SUCCESS > >>>>> [0.173s] > >>>>>>> [INFO] Cayenne Dependency Injection Container ............ SUCCESS > >>>>> [15.565s] > >>>>>>> [INFO] Cayenne Server .................................... FAILURE > >>>>>>> [3:10.456s] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> Test set: org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.244 > >>>>> sec > >>>>>>> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT > >>>>>>> > >>> testConstructorWithProperties(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT) > >>>>>>> Time elapsed: 0.172 sec <<< ERROR! > >>>>>>> org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.4.0.M2 Mar 06 2015 > >>>>> 13:39:49] > >>>>>>> Error initializing DataRowStore. > >>>>>>> at org.jgroups.JChannel.connect(JChannel.java:328) > >>>>>>> at > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > org.apache.cayenne.event.JavaGroupsBridge.startupExternal(JavaGroupsBridge.java:130) > >>>>>>> at > >>> org.apache.cayenne.event.EventBridge.startup(EventBridge.java:245) > >>>>>>> at > >>> org.apache.cayenne.event.EventBridge.startup(EventBridge.java:193) > >>>>>>> at > >>> org.apache.cayenne.event.EventBridge.startup(EventBridge.java:178) > >>>>>>> at > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStore.startListeners(DataRowStore.java:613) > >>>>>>> at > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStore.initWithProperties(DataRowStore.java:182) > >>>>>>> at > >>>>> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStore.<init>(DataRowStore.java:107) > >>>>>>> at > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT.testConstructorWithProperties(DataRowStoreIT.java:63) > >>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>> [DownHandler (UDP)] INFO org.jgroups.protocols.UDP - unicast > sockets > >>>>> will > >>>>>>> use interface 127.0.1.1 > >>>>>>> [main] ERROR org.jgroups.JChannel - exception: java.lang.Exception: > >>>>>>> exception caused by UDP.start(): java.net.SocketException: bad > >>> argument > >>>>> for > >>>>>>> IP_MULTICAST_IF: address not bound to any interface > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> mrg:~$ uname -a > >>>>>>> Linux 3.13.0-46-generic #77-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 2 18:26:13 UTC 2015 > >>> i686 > >>>>>>> i686 i686 GNU/Linux > >>>>>>> mrg:~$ java -version > >>>>>>> java version "1.7.0_75" > >>>>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.5.4) (7u75-2.5.4-1~trusty1) > >>>>>>> OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.75-b04, mixed mode) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any suggestions? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> mrg > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Andrus Adamchik < > >>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 26, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Alex Kolonitsky < > >>>>>>>> akolonit...@objectstyle.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>>>> I've prepared 4.0.M2 artifacts for voting again, I hope this time > >>>>>>>> everything will be fine. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1005 < > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1005> > >>>>>>>>> Assemblies: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.0.M2/ > >>> < > >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.0.M2/> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> Alex Kolonitsky. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 from me. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1. rat.sh - no complaints > >>>>>>>> (noticed .idea/ directory at the root of the source archive. Not a > >>> show > >>>>>>>> stopper for the release, but let's add it to assembly excludes for > >>> the > >>>>>>>> future) > >>>>>>>> 2. checksums - match > >>>>>>>> 3. signatures - match > >>>>>>>> 4. Source builds (mvn verify) > >>>>>>>> 5. Modeler OS X, Windows, Generic versions all start fine > >>>>>>>> 6. Random poking through the structure of the binary assemblies > >>> doesn't > >>>>>>>> show anything abnormal. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> and thanks to Mike for providing a detailed release evaluation > >>> script. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >
