> On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:37 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hah! Well, you might want to hold off on that, as I took a different > approach to the velocity issue -- I joined the project and am working > on a new release :)
This is very nice :) Good luck with it. >> And we do always have the option of using the velocity release that >> internalizes all dependencies so that it has no external dependencies. >> I'll have to look at these again, but I think it packages them. > > No, I'm wrong. It doesn't rename/repackage them, it only unpacks > them, so that's not helpful. Compartmentalizing Velocity dependency should be fairly easy. So we'll be still using it going forward, just that it won't be required. In general I think making Cayenne self-contained is a worthy goal. And it is a low-hanging fruit also. Andrus
