Nice! If we all like them, I can probably find a designer to create hi-res versions.
Andrus > On Mar 29, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Andrew Lindesay <a...@lindesay.co.nz> wrote: > > Hello Michael; > > It is great that you are able to make some improvements to the modeller. > > Some years ago I spent some time drafting-up some replacement icons. > Unfortunately they are not high-resolution and, with current > commitments, I am unlikely to be able to complete them at this time... > > http://www.silvereye.co.nz/tmp/cayenne-icons.pdf > > The concept was that red things are Cayenne and blue/grey/purple with > red/green/purple stipple are database. > > Regards; > > -- > Andrew Lindesay > a...@lindesay.co.nz > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016, at 09:06, Michael Gentry wrote: >> I've spent a few days starting a prototype for a JavaFX-based version of >> Cayenne Modeler. Andrus suggested I share some screenshots with the >> list, >> so here they are: >> >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/54311650/CayenneModelerPrototype/DataDomain.png >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/54311650/CayenneModelerPrototype/DataMap.png >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/54311650/CayenneModelerPrototype/ObjectEntity1.png >> >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/54311650/CayenneModelerPrototype/ObjectEntity2.png >> >> >> The UI is done almost entirely using FXML files and SceneBuilder, so it >> is >> fairly easy to change around. >> >> I was using the 3.1 CM as a basis, but will switch things over to the 4.0 >> CM shortly. >> >> One thing I'm curious about is with the 4.0 CM, the >> attributes/relationships tabs have been merged. With the approach I was >> taking, keeping them separate allowed an "inspector" to appear below the >> the attributes (I was going to take the same approach for relationships) >> so >> that you don't have to deal with a popup inspector. I think this is very >> useful when adding the JavaDoc and Annotations support. Having the >> inspector there obviously takes up valuable screen space, so I'm >> concerned >> that if the attributes and relationships remain merged, as in the 4.0 CM, >> the display area would be quite tight. Maybe we should keep them >> separate? >> >> I've spent 3-4 days on it thus far, but would love some constructive >> feedback, especially if I'm heading down a bad path. >> >> Thanks, >> >> mrg
