> Are we using Log4J bridge to commons-logging?
If I understand correctly, we are using slf4j. We have the following
dependencies:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>jcl-over-slf4j</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
So, I just replaced them with this one:
<dependency>
<groupId>log4j</groupId>
<artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
<version>1.2.17</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
And provided commons-logging.properties and log4j.properties files. I
tested it with cayenne-client module, but it shouldn't be a problem to
apply for the whole project.
2016-05-24 14:15 GMT+03:00 Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>:
>
> > For the purposes of running tests I think it really doesn't matter much
>
> Of course.
>
> > if Savva already has log4j working, then let's just do that.
>
> Are we using Log4J bridge to commons-logging?
>
> Andrus
>
> > On May 24, 2016, at 2:11 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > For the purposes of running tests I think it really doesn't matter much
> and if Savva already has log4j working, then let's just do that. The only
> goal here is to fix Travis and that's only so we can get access to some
> additional databases they make available:
> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/database-setup/
> >
> > Ari
> >
> >
> > On 24/05/2016 8:52pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >> Yeah, whichever way we bridge commons-logging, we need to do it. There
> are two things to consider:
> >>
> >> 1. logging API used in the code (Cayenne core uses common-logging).
> >> 2. logging implementation that bridges #1 and writes the logs out.
> Choices are: Logback, Log4J, slf4j-simple. The first two are configurable
> via properties.
> >>
> >> I have no preference as to #2. There may be some slight benefit in
> switching #1 to SLF, but this is a different discussion.
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>> On May 24, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Savva Kolbachev <s.kolbac...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I don't know a lot about loggers, but I've tried to use the old log4j
> >>> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/log4j/log4j/1.2.17 instead of slf4j
> in
> >>> the test scope and it works. I could handle the behavior
> >>> via commons-logging.properties and log4j.properties files.
> >>>
> >>> So, how about to move from slf4j to log4j for test purposes?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2016-04-18 9:43 GMT+03:00 Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org>:
> >>>
> >>>> On 18/04/2016 4:27pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>>>> "mvn -q" suppresses Maven's own logging.
> >>>>
> >>>> We've already got that, but it doesn't stop much.
> >>>>
> >>>>> This leaves Cayenne's logging. To control that, we need to provide
> >>>> proper logging dependencies in the "test" scope. E.g. add
> >>>> SLF4J-to-commons-loging bridge and Logback jars, and then configure
> Logback
> >>>> to use a minimal prefix for each log line.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was proceeding on the assumption that commons-logging sends to the
> >>>> default Java logger when nothing else is configured. Perhaps you are
> right
> >>>> and we add log4j or slf4j to the test dependencies and then try to
> silence
> >>>> that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ari
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -------------------------->
> >>>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks and Regards
> >>> Savva Kolbachev
> >>
> >
> > --
> > -------------------------->
> > Aristedes Maniatis
> > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Savva Kolbachev
