As I remember we already did several voting attempts before (3 attempts for 4.0.M2 and 2 attempts for 4.0.M3) and there were no confusions. I think it's okay to keep the same release version in such situations.
Looks like this time the confusion comes from the "[VOTE] 4.0.M5 release v2" subject of the mail thread that has been treated as voting for 4.0.M5-v2 or something. Yeah, it's definitely better to have clearer subject like "[VOTE] 4.0.M5 second attempt" etc. If we don't want to have several voting attempts for the same release version, I think we could discuss it in the different thread. But in this case I would suggest to continue voting as we don't have frequent releases and each of them is a party :) I have been able to successfully check the release, so here is my +1. On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm published new files for 4.0.M5 release and you can start voting > (again). > > The only difference should be fix for CAY-2242. > > > > Here are links: > > Maven: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachecayenne-1013 > > Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.0.M5/ > > > > Sorry for inconvenience, hope this one will be promoted to the official > release. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Nikita Timofeev > > I ran through my usual checklist: > > 1. MD5 matches > 2. Signature checks > 3. rat passes > 4. LICENSE and NOTICE files present in the root of the distro > 5. builds from source > 6. Modeler runs on OS X > 7. Cross-platform Modeler runs on OS X > 8. Modeler runs on Windows > > Everything passed successfully. Additionally I tried upgrading LinkRest > and LinkMove frameworks on local branches using the staging Maven repo. It > worked flawlessly (though we need to mention in the UPGRADE.txt that Derby > PK generator has been switched to sequences from AUTO_PK_TABLE. This did > affect one of the LinkMove tests). > > My vote is +1. > > Andrus > > > > -- Best Regards, Savva Kolbachev
