Ah, sorry. Didn't check the full history. Andrus
> On Apr 17, 2017, at 3:06 AM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> > wrote: > > Hi Andrus, > > Yes it was bad and fixed immediately in the next commit: > https://github.com/apache/cayenne/commit/67c947e0b8a702cab023032ae0a721d13ac7abbf > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: >> >>> On Apr 14, 2017, at 1:08 AM, ntimof...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> /** >>> - * Orders a given list of objects, using a List of Orderings applied >>> - * according the default iteration order of the Orderings list. I.e. >>> each >>> - * Ordering with lower index is more significant than any other >>> Ordering >>> - * with higher index. List being ordered is modified in place. >>> - * >>> + * Return the sorted list of objects. >>> * @since 4.0 >>> */ >>> public static <E> List<E> orderedList(Collection<E> objects, List<? >>> extends Ordering> orderings) { >> >> Hmm.. this Javadoc change doesn't look right. The old Javadoc was correct >> except for the last sentence (this method is not modifying the list in >> place). The new Javadoc is not helpful at all. >> >> Andrus > > > > -- > Best regards, > Nikita Timofeev
