I'm fine with obfuscating the staging site to confuse search engines. I'll do that later.
There are WAY too many board@ e-mails... I'm actually surprised I saw this one from Sally. Most I just file away. The location I put the support badge was largely lifted from the POI site. I even lifted their graphic since the original one Sally posted didn't have transparency information (all a white background, which didn't work in our header). On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > > > On May 21, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > That's the main change. I also added a link to the Staging CMS site > since > > I had to dig that up (didn't know it offhand). > > Exposing staging links publicly and adding more weight to them by creating > links from the main site will be bad for SEO (a link to a second copy of > the site will confuse Google as to which is the primary page). Wish we had > the ability to set <link rel="canonical"../> for each page to help Google. > So maybe remove the <a> tag from that link, and simply keep the text? > > > Yes, the Board was requesting it. Are you still getting the board@ > e-mails? > > I do. I just don't have time to read all of them. :) > > > If so, look for the "[PMCs] Seeking your help for ASF's 18th > > Anniversary" thread from Sally. > > Got it. Perhaps in the new design we'll find a better place for it. I > guess for now it is fine where it is. > > > (And yes, it was back in March, but I'm > > lagged -- allergy season and work haven't been my friend.) > > Sorry to hear about the allergies. > > Andrus > >
