I have the same test failure. If I skip the tests, the rest of the release check completes successfully for me, so I am +1.
I'd recommend just adding an @Ignore annotation to this test so that the rest of the tests can be run without any problems. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:55 AM Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> wrote: > Andrus mentioned problems with this test too, it fails more than passes. > I think it still fails sometime in master branch and this problem > should be addressed some day. > Though it doesn't look like a new issue for this release. > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > [mrg 10:14:00] > > > ~/Projects/Cayenne-Release/cayenne-3.1.3-src/framework/cayenne-jdk1.5-unpublished/target/surefire-reports > >> cat org.apache.cayenne.util.DeepMergeOperationTest.txt > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Test set: org.apache.cayenne.util.DeepMergeOperationTest > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.019 sec > > <<< FAILURE! > > testDeepMergeModified(org.apache.cayenne.util.DeepMergeOperationTest) > Time > > elapsed: 0.01 sec <<< ERROR! > > org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.3.1.3 Jul 18 2018 > 15:08:05] > > Commit Exception > > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.flushToParent(DataContext.java:845) > > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.commitChanges(DataContext.java:756) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.util.DeepMergeOperationTest.testDeepMergeModified(DeepMergeOperationTest.java:67) > > Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Unique constraint violation: > SYS_IDX_840 > > in statement [INSERT INTO ARTIST (ARTIST_ID, ARTIST_NAME, DATE_OF_BIRTH) > > VALUES (?, ?, ?)] > > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.throwError(Unknown Source) > > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(Unknown Source) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.runAsIndividualQueries(BatchAction.java:207) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.performAction(BatchAction.java:86) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction.runQuery(DataNodeQueryAction.java:87) > > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNode.performQueries(DataNode.java:280) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainFlushAction.runQueries(DataDomainFlushAction.java:233) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainFlushAction.flush(DataDomainFlushAction.java:154) > > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncFlush(DataDomain.java:853) > > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$2.transform(DataDomain.java:817) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.runInTransaction(DataDomain.java:877) > > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncNoFilters(DataDomain.java:814) > > at > > > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:1035) > > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSync(DataDomain.java:785) > > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.flushToParent(DataContext.java:817) > > ... 27 more > > > > I don't think that is a system issue... > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:39 AM Nikita Timofeev < > ntimof...@objectstyle.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi all. > >> > >> This is a maintenance release of 3.1 version. > >> > >> Maven repo: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1022/ > >> Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/3.1.3/ > >> > >> Please evaluate it and cast your votes. > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Nikita Timofeev > >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Nikita Timofeev >
