If we want to move off Swing I'd say this JavaFX project you started is the
best way to go.

I can't get it to run out of the box. Any chance you could get it running
again?

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:49 PM Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've considered an Electron app in the past. One negative is you lose
> access to existing Java code, but perhaps there is a way around this I've
> not seen.
>
> Examples:
> - Existing code to read model XML files.
> - JDBC drivers.
> - Velocity (assuming we want to continue using Velocity templates).
>
> For anyone curious, I thought JavaFX was looking good before I lost
> momentum:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cayenne-modeler
>
> If you look carefully, you'll see some of the extra features in the
> screenshots I was planning on adding, plus multiple windows (same project
> or different projects) in the video.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:58 PM Lon Varscsak <lon.varsc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > What about an Electron app? 😬
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:59 PM John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My 2 cents is that Java desktop UI is effectively dead. So switching to
> > > another UI library that is either already dead or is dying isn't a
> great
> > > use of time. So I would try to change it as little as possible.
> > >
> > > For the tables with editable cells problem, my recommendation would be
> to
> > > move editing into a separate "inspector" area that is laid out as a
> > > vertical form. Then the table can be read-only.
> > >
> > > For layout, I liked MigLayout when I did Swing apps back in the day.
> But
> > > that doesn't solve the problem with the existing usage of JGoodies.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:37 AM Andrus Adamchik <aadamc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I see a couple of problems with the current UI (beside it being
> > > > subjectively old) :
> > > >
> > > > * We are effectively blocked from any significant evolution of the
> > > > Modeler. Any time we want to do anything fancy (e.g. improve
> usability
> > of
> > > > tables with editable cells, etc.), we quickly run into the wall with
> > > Swing
> > > > capabilities.
> > > > * JGoodies library that we depend heavily upon for layouts is no
> longer
> > > > free/open source [1], creating risks for JVM upgrades.
> > > >
> > > > So modernization of the Modeler is a practical matter.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like Fleet is not using Compose [2], but a lesser known
> JetBrains
> > > > Toolbox does [3]. And everyone admits it is still raw.
> > > >
> > > > Andrus
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://www.jgoodies.com/downloads/libraries/
> > > > [2] https://twitter.com/jetbrains/status/1465245360973131777 <
> > > > https://twitter.com/jetbrains/status/1465245360973131777>
> > > > [3]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blog.jetbrains.com/kotlin/2021/08/compose-multiplatform-goes-alpha/#toolbox
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blog.jetbrains.com/kotlin/2021/08/compose-multiplatform-goes-alpha/#toolbox
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 12:48 AM, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that compose UI library is used to build the new upcoming
> > IDE
> > > > > from JetBrains called Fleet. So I expect it will continue to be
> > > supported
> > > > > unless that product completely flops.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't mind the current modeler UI. It's good enough for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.jetbrains.com/fleet/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 2:15 AM Andrus Adamchik <
> aadamc...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> A datapoint to our perennial discussion of technology to use for
> the
> > > > >> future CayenneModeler... With Swing being old and crusty, and
> JavaFX
> > > no
> > > > >> longer supported by Oracle, perhaps we should be looking for
> > something
> > > > >> fresh. I just came across a new "Compose Multiplatform" desktop UI
> > > > >> framework by JetBrains [1]. It is programmed in Kotlin and is
> based
> > on
> > > > >> Google toolkit for Android. Their GitHub examples [2] are not that
> > > > visually
> > > > >> impressive, but I would imagine it is a matter of styling. A
> > million $
> > > > >> question is whether it will be around and open source in 10-15
> > years.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Anyone knows anything about it?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Andrus
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/compose-mpp/
> > > > >> [2]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/JetBrains/compose-jb/blob/master/artwork/readme/apps.png
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to