Ok, to back up my intuition on the license headers I am going to lean on the "lack of creativity" exception and "PMC judgement" clause in the ASF policy :)
https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions Andrus > On Jun 14, 2026, at 11:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am +1. I added MCP checks to my previous checklist (and they pass). Haven't > tested Modeler on Windows. > > Noticed the Mac .dmg doesn't have the background image and our custom layout. > The contents of the .dmg are correct though, so this is not a blocker either. > (I've seen my own builds losing the layout on rare occasions; never got to > the bottom of it though). > > One of the unit tests was missing the Apache header (my fault, I fixed that > already on the "past-M2" branch). I don't think this disqualifies the > release. This is an internal unit test, and is not expected to be referenced > or embedded by the end users in their code. Also the new .md files don't have > Apache headers, which I think is totally ok. > > Anyone has a different opinion on this? > > Andrus > > >> On Jun 13, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello everyone! >> >> Finally time for the 5.0 M2 release! >> Thanks Nikita and Andrus for helping with my environmental issues! >> Hopefully smoother in the future. (I'll have to give Windows the stinky >> eye.) >> >> Release Notes: >> https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/cayenne-parent-5.0-M2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> >> Maven Repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1063/ >> >> Assemblies (Note the updated KEYS file there): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/ >> >> Please evaluate the assemblies and cast your votes. >> >> Thanks, >> mrg >
