The overall impact outside of the narrow JDBC benchmark will likely be less 
impressive. But I suspect it may also have a noticeable positive effect on DB 
server load. Please share how it looks in real life :) 

Andrus


> On Jul 6, 2026, at 5:04 PM, John Huss <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 2x faster select queries is amazing! 🔥
> 
> I'm testing it right away! Thank you!
> 
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 3:29 PM Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> But... The Screaming Logs is so punk.
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 9:37 AM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I wanted to highlight a few things in the upcoming M3. They are already
>> on
>>> master, so maybe some brave souls can take it for a spin and give us
>>> feedback :)
>>> 
>>> 1. Cayenne no longer wraps selecting queries (or at least those it can
>>> reliably identify as selecting) into transactions.
>>> 
>>> I had a suspicion for years that we shouldn't be doing that. Now I was
>>> able to vibecode real benchmarks on multiple databases, and time savings
>> in
>>> the JDBC layer with faster queries are about 2x! (as each useless
>> "commit"
>>> is a separate command sent to DB that needs to be processed). But this
>>> means that for the first time Cayenne operates with Connection
>>> "autoCommit=true". So I'd appreciate feedback if this causes any
>> weirdness
>>> with your DataSources.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2. SQL logging changes. There are multiple changes. Some address
>>> operational concerns (saving hundreds of GB of storage space; single-line
>>> logs are easier to parse), others are "quality of life":
>>> 
>>> * No tx for selects (mentioned above) by itself cuts down on 2 log lines
>>> per query
>>> * The new logger name is short and descriptive "cayenne-sql"
>>> * ERROR log level for queries that result in exceptions
>>> * SQL query logs are single-line. Parameters, timers, result counters,
>>> generated keys are placed on one line and rendered in a compact format.
>> Tx
>>> wrapping is still done on separate lines (as a tx can include more than
>> one
>>> SQL statement)
>>> 
>>> INFO cayenne-sql tx started
>>> INFO cayenne-sql INSERT INTO BINARY_PK_TEST1(BIN_ID, NAME) VALUES(?, ?) |
>>> 
>> bind:[BIN_ID:FBBC4034ED8F0214B2C559CF1029C1868A66F0D59208A36C9365126C248C...,NAME:'master1']
>>> updated:1 time_ms:0
>>> INFO cayenne-sql tx committed
>>> 
>>> * Mnemonic table aliases. No more meaningless t0, t1, t2:
>>> 
>>> INFO cayenne-sql SELECT p.ESTIMATED_PRICE, p.PAINTING_DESCRIPTION,
>>> p.PAINTING_TITLE, p.ARTIST_ID, p.GALLERY_ID, p.PAINTING_ID, g.GALLERY_ID,
>>> g.GALLERY_NAME FROM PAINTING p LEFT JOIN GALLERY g ON p.GALLERY_ID =
>>> g.GALLERY_ID | selected:1 time_ms:0
>>> 
>>> * No alias for single-table queries
>>> 
>>> INFO cayenne-sql - SELECT ESTIMATED_PRICE, PAINTING_DESCRIPTION,
>>> PAINTING_TITLE, ARTIST_ID, GALLERY_ID, PAINTING_ID FROM PAINTING |
>>> selected:2 time_ms:0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (I am also thinking of lowercasing the SQL so that logs don't look like
>>> they are screaming at you :))
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to