Thanks Andrus for the details; it makes a lot of sense once you spell it
out loud.

Giulio Cesare



On Fri, 17 Jul 2026 at 23:00, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote:

> Using "autoCommit=false", the DB would implicitly BEGIN a tx on select. So
> without a commit it will leave an idle transaction behind with some
> resources allocated for it on the DB side. While your connection pool may
> (or may not) rollback the tx when a connection is returned, but in general,
> connection user is responsible to call either commit or rollback if
> "autoCommit=false" is in effect.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> > On Jul 17, 2026, at 2:14 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > Hello Andrus,
> >
> > more of a curiosity here than an actual Cayenne consideration: I love
> > the idea of non performing an explicit commit for select queries, but
> > do you actually need the set 'autoCommit=true', or is this just a safe
> > option in case there were triggers or other subtle changes on the data
> > that would not be saved otherwise?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Giulio Cesare
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2026 at 10:35 PM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The M3 change only affects selects. Previously, each select was
> performed with autoCommit=false, and was followed by an explicit
> Connection.commit(). Now we switched to autoCommit=true and no explicit
> commit.
> >>
> >> Hope this explains the change.
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jul 12, 2026, at 4:10 AM, Jurgen Doll <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Andrus
> >>>
> >>> Wrt autoCommit I'm a bit puzzled as to why: "Cayenne no longer wraps
> selecting queries ...." therefore ".... this means that for the first time
> Cayenne operates with Connection 'autoCommit=true'" ? Are selects and
> autoCommit related in some way ?
> >>> I'm asking because in my understanding autoCommit is only relevant to
> updates and inserts which will still be wrapped as transactions won't they ?
> >>> Or are you saying that there isn't any default transaction wrapping at
> all any more in Cayenne, even for inserts and updates ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for a great library!
> >>> Jurgen
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 11 2026, at 9:21 pm, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>> As a Cayenne user, the majority of my apps in the last 25 years were
> "autoCommit=false" just because that's how the framework worked. So this is
> also new to me and based on research, not production experience. So I'd
> very much like to get community feedback on the actual behavior and
> potential pitfalls.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrus
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 11, 2026, at 4:52 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Andrus,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> But this means that for the first time Cayenne operates with
> Connection "autoCommit=true".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 😱
> >>>>> This setting is more scary that an Halloween costume to me! 😅
> >>>>> I trust your understanding of the trade-offs at play, but I have
> >>>>> always considered autoCommit the option used by toy projects, not
> >>>>> suitable for serious tasks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But my views may well be obsolete by now. 😁
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers, and –as always– huge congratulations to all people involved
> in
> >>>>> moving the project forward.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Giulio Cesare
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 3:17 PM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am glad the new change didn't break much stuff :) Always a
> concern with all the new ideas.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BTW, as you probably noticed, we are now exposing translated
> queries with parameters as standalone record objects instead of going
> straight from translator to PreparedStatement, so they can be captured,
> inspected, logged, etc (e.g., what the SQLLogger does).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And on the broader topic of observability, we started an effort to
> integrate OpenTelemetry into Bootique, and I hope this will come back to
> Cayenne as well. Would be nice to have otel spans for queries. But as your
> video demonstrates, explicit instrumentation is almost irrelevant these
> days. The tools are so good... they can grab the logs, or do automated
> runtime instrumentation and show you transaction traces with next to zero
> effort.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 6, 2026, at 7:15 PM, Hugi Thordarson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Andrus,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> first — that logging is a vast, vast improvement, I'm loving it!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So happens I've been playing a lot with Cayenne's logging lately.
> Very happy about how easy it was/is to hook into query logging and I've
> used it to profile SQL-queries in my web application templates for years
> now — keeping track of the time methods spend querying to find performance
> problems (profiling/aggregating by bindings rather than methods really, in
> WO terms) and watching the SQL they executed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Helpful, but has always been private utility logic for myself
> since it just prints ugly text reports and I never took the time to make it
> pretty and usable for others.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But that was before Claude :). So now there's this: Inline SQL
> logging. Probably easiest described through video —
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoW1WusKSRo .
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> …works great with the new SQLLogger interface. Already ported,
> since I'll be switching to -SNAPSHOT (in dev only for a while, to test the
> behaviour of the new transaction setup, really looking forward to putting
> it through it's paces).
> >>>>>>> Been using M2 in production since release and it works great,
> congrats on another awesome release :).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> - hugi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 6 Jul 2026, at 13:37, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I wanted to highlight a few things in the upcoming M3. They are
> already on master, so maybe some brave souls can take it for a spin and
> give us feedback :)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1. Cayenne no longer wraps selecting queries (or at least those
> it can reliably identify as selecting) into transactions.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I had a suspicion for years that we shouldn't be doing that. Now
> I was able to vibecode real benchmarks on multiple databases, and time
> savings in the JDBC layer with faster queries are about 2x! (as each
> useless "commit" is a separate command sent to DB that needs to be
> processed). But this means that for the first time Cayenne operates with
> Connection "autoCommit=true". So I'd appreciate feedback if this causes any
> weirdness with your DataSources.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2. SQL logging changes. There are multiple changes. Some address
> operational concerns (saving hundreds of GB of storage space; single-line
> logs are easier to parse), others are "quality of life":
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * No tx for selects (mentioned above) by itself cuts down on 2
> log lines per query
> >>>>>>>> * The new logger name is short and descriptive "cayenne-sql"
> >>>>>>>> * ERROR log level for queries that result in exceptions
> >>>>>>>> * SQL query logs are single-line. Parameters, timers, result
> counters, generated keys are placed on one line and rendered in a compact
> format. Tx wrapping is still done on separate lines (as a tx can include
> more than one SQL statement)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> INFO cayenne-sql tx started
> >>>>>>>> INFO cayenne-sql INSERT INTO BINARY_PK_TEST1(BIN_ID, NAME)
> VALUES(?, ?) |
> bind:[BIN_ID:FBBC4034ED8F0214B2C559CF1029C1868A66F0D59208A36C9365126C248C...,NAME:'master1']
> updated:1 time_ms:0
> >>>>>>>> INFO cayenne-sql tx committed
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * Mnemonic table aliases. No more meaningless t0, t1, t2:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> INFO cayenne-sql SELECT p.ESTIMATED_PRICE,
> p.PAINTING_DESCRIPTION, p.PAINTING_TITLE, p.ARTIST_ID, p.GALLERY_ID,
> p.PAINTING_ID, g.GALLERY_ID, g.GALLERY_NAME FROM PAINTING p LEFT JOIN
> GALLERY g ON p.GALLERY_ID = g.GALLERY_ID | selected:1 time_ms:0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * No alias for single-table queries
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> INFO cayenne-sql - SELECT ESTIMATED_PRICE, PAINTING_DESCRIPTION,
> PAINTING_TITLE, ARTIST_ID, GALLERY_ID, PAINTING_ID FROM PAINTING |
> selected:2 time_ms:0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (I am also thinking of lowercasing the SQL so that logs don't
> look like they are screaming at you :))
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Andrus
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to