This vote is canceled due to recent bug fixes.

Thanks,
Ethan Feng

Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> 于2024年6月12日周三 16:41写道:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I have checked:
>
> - Download links are valid.
> - git commit hash is correct
> - Checksums and signatures are valid.
> - No binary files in the source release
> - Successfully built binary from source via ./build/make-distribution.sh 
> -Pspark-3.5/flink-1.19/mr
>
> Meanwhile, I have upgraded internal version to 0.5.0 in our production 
> environment.
>
> Regards,
> Nicholas Jiang
>
> On 2024/06/12 05:56:07 Ethan Feng wrote:
> > Hello, Celeborn community,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn
> > 0.5.0-rc2
> >
> > The git tag to be voted upon:
> > https://github.com/apache/celeborn/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc2
> >
> > Source and binary artifacts can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celeborn/v0.5.0-rc2
> >
> > The git commit hash:
> > 68c503eb0023e274f8ae09bf4c2687f6a0c01a25
> >
> > The staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1075/
> >
> > The fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts is signed with:
> > FCF20BB29C7BEFDF58F998F76392F71F37356FA0
> >
> > My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/celeborn/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > number of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason)
> >
> > Steps to validate the release:
> > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> >
> > * Download links, checksums, and PGP signatures are valid.
> > * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release.
> > * LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
> > * All files have license headers if necessary.
> > * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
> > * The source tarball matches the git tag.
> > * Build from source is successful.
> >
> > There are additional tests:
> > * Performance test no regression
> > 1 TB TPC-DS, 0.5.0 VS 0.4.1 : 2042(s) VS 2050(s)
> > 1.1 TB pure shuffle, 0.5.0 VS 0.4.1 : 11.8min vs 11.8min
> >
> > * Result correctness test passed
> > 1TB TPC-DS runs concurrently, the results are identical.
> >
> > * Usability test passed
> > Rolling upgrade from version 0.4.1 to 0.5.0 succeed.
> > The metrics system works as expected.
> >
> > * Stability test passed
> > Random worker failures, Celeborn works as expected.
> > Random master failures, Celeborn works as expected.
> > Master meta corrupted, Celeborn works as expected.
> >
> > * Compatibility test passed
> > The Celeborn server version of 0.5.0 works fine with the Celeborn client 
> > 0.4.1.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ethan Feng
> >

Reply via email to