+1,
I checked 
- the git commit hash is correct
- download links are valid
- checksums are good
```
shasum --check apache-celeborn-0.5.3-bin.tgz.sha512
shasum --check apache-celeborn-0.5.3-source.tgz.sha512
```
- signatures are good
```
gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.5.3-bin.tgz.asc apache-celeborn-0.5.3-bin.tgz
gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.5.3-source.tgz.asc 
apache-celeborn-0.5.3-source.tgz
```
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good.
- Build from source is successful.
```
./build/make-distribution.sh --release
```
Regards,
Fei Wang

On 2024/12/27 12:07:16 Ethan Feng wrote:
> Hi, Celeborn community,
> 
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn
> 0.5.3-rc1
> 
> The git tag to be voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/celeborn/releases/tag/v0.5.3-rc1
> 
> The git commit hash:
> ea8811e3ad06527e1c7014b0b79ffdc3519cf5f2
> 
> Source and binary artifacts can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celeborn/v0.5.3-rc1
> 
> The staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1094
> 
> The fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts is signed with the following:
> FCF2 0BB2 9C7B EFDF 58F9  98F7 6392 F71F 3735 6FA0
> 
> My public key to verify signatures can be found in:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/celeborn/KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number of votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason)
> 
> Steps to validate the release:
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> 
> * Download links, checksums, and PGP signatures are valid.
> * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release.
> * LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
> * All files have license headers if necessary.
> * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
> * The source tarball matches the git tag.
> * Build from source is successful.
> 
> The following scenarios were tested:
> 1. TPC-DS with data replication on, random worker kill, verified data
> correctness.
> 2. TPC-DS with random worker kill, verified data correctness.
> 3. TPC-DS with stage rerun, verified data correctness.
> 
> Regards,
> Ethan Feng
> 

Reply via email to