+1(binding) I checked: √ release files in the correct location √ digital signature and hashes are correct √ LICENSE and NOTICE files exist and are correct √ The contents of the release match the tag in VCS √ can build the release from the source √ The maven artifacts look correct √ Verified TPCDS correctness with data replication and worker kill
Thanks, Ethan Feng Fei Wang <feiw...@apache.org> 于2025年3月11日周二 07:40写道: > > +1, > I checked > - the git commit hash is correct > - download links are valid > - checksums are good > - signatures are good > - LICENSE and NOTICE look good. > - Build from source is successful with command: build/make-distribution.sh > --sbt-enabled --release > Regards, > Fei Wang > > On 2025/03/10 06:59:07 Nicholas wrote: > > Hi Celeborn community, > > > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn > > 0.5.4-rc1 > > > > > > The git tag to be voted upon: > > https://github.com/apache/celeborn/releases/tag/v0.5.4-rc1 > > > > > > The git commit hash: > > cf6ac8cc1d0b013c21a4894776e560c3d63dc42e source and binary artifacts can be > > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celeborn/v0.5.4-rc1 > > > > > > The staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1105 > > > > > > Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with: > > 92B13217E2AD1470D58882EF7B41580856A83A36 > > > > > > My public key to verify signatures can be found in: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/celeborn/KEYS > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary > > number of votes are reached. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason) > > > > > > Steps to validate the release: > > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > > > > > * Download links, checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release. > > * LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. > > * All files have license headers if necessary. > > * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > * The source tarball matches the git tag. > > * Build from source is successful. > > > > > > Regards, > > Nicholas Jiang