-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
Looks good to me. Regards, Erik On 09-02-15 09:32, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > I've updated the report. Please take a look, if all is ok, I'll > post it this evening or tomorrow. I've also added some in-line > comments below. > > ---- Celix is an OSGi like implementation in C with a distinct > focus on interoperability between Java and C. > > Activity In the last months there has been a lot of activity, > issues have been filed and resolved. Also we are working on > removing the usage of APR. Issues with the website have been fixed, > a getting started guide has been added [1]. Wrt publicity, a talk > about Celix was given at the FOSDEM 2015. > > Statistics: * Last committer added: 2014-03-04 * Last PMC member > added: 2014-07-17 > > * Mailing list activity in october - january: 93 messages on dev * > Commits since october: 193 commits * Last release: 2014-02-24: > Apache Celix 1.0.0 release > > [1]: http://celix.apache.org/documentation/getting_started.html > ------ > > > 2015-02-05 9:40 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes <[email protected]>: >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Erik Jansman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Not sure if it should be here but I'll ask it anyway, what is >>> the next big development goal? >> >> Well big goal ... In my opinion removing APR and stabilizing is >> the next goal. >> > > I thinks once APR is removed we should make a new (2.0?) release. > One item that needs to be discussed is wether we want to have an > build option to still be able to maintain the old API (mostly the > bundle_context providing a memory pool). > > > >> >> After that or probably parallel I expect some commits on remote >> services (IDL, code generation new protocol/serialization). Not >> sure if this is mentioned before, but these coming changes are >> done under the INAETICS research program [1][2]. When the time is >> right I will post some more info / start a discussion. >> >> I'm very interesting in this work. Not sure if there is already >> some code > being written, if so, why not do it directly in the Celix repo? So > that other people can view/test it? If not, can this be done > directly in the Celix repo? I'm not sure if the research project > setup makes this possible.. So if there are objections to this, I'm > looking forward to some patches/code donations! > > Back to the subject of this thread, the report is imho complete, if > there is still something missing, let me know! If more info is > needed on the other subjects, please start a new mail thread. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU2PrnAAoJEPdIdwtvIe9Qm9wP/j49fTeDwJglZss9hpKWP1He MWJyOjeZHRkkGGbNV7t6mS1XAFRpw1hOcKSUtI7a6VEiFLlM8SsEnTxT54vaOTJR NXPD/UXD+X4ClWnvDmOyrncPtwO7eT8G20bfjAY4Fh3LJLV1ImrH+VJ+VdOB8NWI di8SYoK7wphCVAyvwlOWnVNYZ6+aXs1pS+Ec4zma2eoIQo/bkOuRu5bn9BcRDCuM QhicwZe8goUOYtI4dr5GAvyv9nVH9cu2IGNv2rRm87ZcDRl/JgK1HJ0XDDr1GaPc jfMXOFP2hmX33C7WfB1Q7lc7CmY/K0CXPTBft44dsT4TpIUot/TT7gnBFhip/cub 0BuiRLnlRsRSuKoiNN8viB5K06Pnqvk9fjD0EkfkqysOLYCdI3Xl9irHBbOICqQ1 yHHS+5lS9WG3uJcCrq4kAsdGIMSV6THpN633Hk7jSPirvwhXWTRCgmsgbj1xb8Qi tjh72QxBa6V6RWkI3EWJNKvCHeSdJaWQuzTNhwbGMVeh8JO0GgnfIQevkwmnJSbV Vsp74Idptzn23of28ojgf+sxLF2+3XrCsLu8pXsa84K3rl872Zz7ZLUPS527uH5I AkElt/Sh4/GUxEQ2WWTy0GMSexiyKZCe4UPMAb2t6YdVPUi62o3GSGKc47vnU8Ve 0EIKkhbKKPMzawPOtKb4 =u/n7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
