rlenferink commented on issue #65: Adapt discovery_shm to use discovery server URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/issues/65#issuecomment-536193256 _Comment by @abroekhuis:_ Already emailed with Bjoern about this, but adding it here for future reference. The update SHM discovery uses the discovery webserver, and as such is not strictly based on shared memory anymore. I think we need a solution that does not require any web technology, and that this discovery should still use shared memory. I do think it makes sense to use the XML format, and as such I think we should split the current discovery into a endpoint handling and a separate transport part. Than the endpoint handling can be reused, and a new transport can be added for SHM. This also makes it possible for different solutions wrt discovery. This can leave the basic architecture intact, where the discovery itself is "discovered" through any other means, and only after this discovery a direct communication is in place for retrieving the endpoints. But where needed/possible on mechanism can be used for both. I think that for SHM both solutions are possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
