PengZheng commented on PR #726: URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/726#issuecomment-1933414707
> tnetstring could be a nice fitting solution, but maybe we should also reconsider using JSON are serialization format? Downside is that we then make a JSON lib (i.e. jansson) a required lib for celix_utils and therefore celix_framework, but this will save some implementation effort. I agree with the above assessment: - JSON provides a well-defined and well-known serialization format. - Using a high quality JSON implementation like jansson will save lots of implementation efforts. As we already observed in #674, with typing support `celix_properties` will become more like JSON: > It will be nice to have array support. If we went one step further to support embedding properties, celix properties will become json. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@celix.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
