Hey any response?

On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 5:15 PM Prasanna Bhavan na23b064 <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Celix community,
>
> My name is Prasanna, and I am interested in applying to Google Summer of
> Code 2026 with Apache Celix.
>
> I am currently exploring the project ideas and wanted to ask whether the
> project titled "" is expected to be undertaken as part of GSoC this year. I
> am trying to understand which ideas are actively being considered so that I
> can focus my efforts on the most relevant areas and start contributing
> accordingly.
>
> Any clarification or guidance would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
> Best regards,
> Prasanna
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 5:15 PM moelksasbyahmed (via GitHub) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> moelksasbyahmed commented on PR #817:
>> URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/817#issuecomment-3859979345
>>
>>    > In my view, we should either accept a slower build (limiting
>> parallelism to (.i.e.) -j4) or postpone the analyzer's introduction. I
>> personally prefer the slower build. We can look into ASF-hosted runners
>> later to optimize.
>>    well i tried to make it slow by enable  -j2 and i ran the workflow on
>> my forked repo the debug build reached memory limit and has `exit code of
>> 143`  check [forked repo workflow](
>> https://github.com/moelksasbyahmed/celix/actions/runs/21686945878/job/62536446202)
>> so i guess the valid options is making the build so slow by making ninja
>> -j1 or making a specific Ci pipeline with test disabled but i agree with
>> you the test should be compatible with test as well so i guess the only
>> valid option is making the build slow by ninja -j1 and it can be optimized
>> later i will search for valid solutions
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
>> To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
>> URL above to go to the specific comment.
>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>

Reply via email to