I have added a workaround. If you have the chance to test a 0.4.0 snapshot, please let us know if it works.

Thanks,

Florian


On 10/06/2011 19:42, Degroff, Nathan wrote:
According to the EMC Documentum CMIS Reference Guide (ver 6.7), the two 
Repository Capabilities are false:

     capabilityPWCUpdatable - This capability cannot be implemented because 
Documentum does not have a PWC feature.
     capabilityPWCSearchable - This capability cannot be implemented because 
Documentum does not have a PWC feature.


The ID of the original doc is passed back when:

     ObjectId pwcId = document.checkOut();

However, if in the same session you call:

        document.cancelCheckOut()

the LinkCache for "self" is the actual checkedout link which works.

The issue comes in if you are opening a new session for a docuemnt that is 
already checked out and you want to cancel out an item you checked out in a 
previous session or in some other application.  If you retrieve the document 
using:

        session.getCheckedOutDocs()

The LinkCache result for "self" when calling cancelCheckOut() gives you the 
working-copy link.  However, you have to iterate over the collection of checked out docs 
to get the right document.

-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Müller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:18 PM
To: [email protected]; Degroff, Nathan
Subject: Re: VersioningService.cancelCheckOut() and working-copy vs self rel 
link

Hi Nathan,

Thanks for your report!

I can't really comment on the EMC Documentum CMIS implementation because I 
haven't had a chance to test it extensively.


Could you describe how you get the PWC id in the first place?
Did you do something like this:   ObjectId pwcId = document.checkOut();

If so, EMC does not return the PWC entry but the document entry, which would be 
a bug on their end.


Using the working-copy relation would be a valid workaround. Let me play with 
that a bit and if it works with other repositories, I'll open an issue and 
change it.


Thanks,

Florian



On 10/06/2011 16:22, Degroff, Nathan wrote:
To whom it may concern,

Topic:      VersioningService.cancelCheckOut()
Binding:    AtomPub
Issue:      Deletion of object rather than cancelling checkout
Repository: EMC Documentum

We encountered an issue with utilizing the OpenCMIS client where depending on 
how you retrieve the Document, the system would send a DELETE for the actual 
object:

DELETE 
http://<host>:<port>/<app>/resources/repositories/<repository>/objects/<roid>

instead of the working copy:

DELETE 
http://<host>:<port>/<app>/resources/repositories/<repository>/checkedout/<roid>

There are many ways around it by retrieving the doc using the 
Session.getCheckedOutDocs() and then calling cancelCheckOut() from that object 
or just calling the SOAP version (which calls the checkout operation directly), 
but I was wondering if this is a culmination of:

      -) CMIS 1.0 Spec specifying the "self" relationship while calling cancelCheckOut() 
instead of using the "working-copy" relationship link
      -) EMC CMIS implementation not supporting a PWC


After tracing and inspecting to the LinkCache, I can see that if (atompub package) 
VersioningServiceImpl used Constants.REL_WORKINGCOPY it would work in all instances 
whether you checked the doc out in the same "OpenCMIS" session or if you are 
pulling it back from a new session.

      public void cancelCheckOut(String repositoryId, String objectId, 
ExtensionsData extension) {
          // find the link
          String link = loadLink(repositoryId, objectId, 
Constants.REL_WORKINGCOPY, Constants.MEDIATYPE_ENTRY);

          if (link == null) {
              throwLinkException(repositoryId, objectId, 
Constants.REL_WORKINGCOPY, Constants.MEDIATYPE_ENTRY);
          }

          delete(new UrlBuilder(link));
      }

We were able to pull back many different ways to deal with it especially pulling back the 
"checkedOutDocs" collection, but any thoughts would be appreciated.  Pulling 
the doc directly without having to iterate through a collection to find the doc one needs.


Reply via email to