IMHO it would be sufficient to release zip packages. I assume they can be extracted on all platforms meanwhile.
Jens On 26.09.12 16:54, "Florian Müller" <[email protected]> wrote: > A general question regarding the release: > Do we need the tar.gz release packages? Wouldn't the zip packages be > sufficient? > > What do you think? > > > Cheers, > > Florian > > >> I am happy to do the release. Will wait for JMP final touches and go. >> >> Couple of things to speed up the process and not incur in unexpected >> issues: >> >> 1. Are there any changes required to the build / release process? >> (AKA new >> / changed packages) If so, can you open an issue and assign it to me >> so I >> can take care of it? >> >> 2. If you have worked on some module since last release, can you >> please run >> a 'mvn clean install -Papache-release' on that module to ensure it >> still >> builds fine in the release profile? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Gab >> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:57 PM, JMP <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Just need to review and find the last difference between core and >>> android >>> version. >>> Work in progress... I'm going to check everything tonight. >>> >>> +1 otherwise >>> >>> Jean Marie PASCAL >>> Blog : www.opensourceecm.fr // www.open-source-ecm.com >>> E-Mail : [email protected] >>> Skype : jeanmarie.pascal >>> Twitter : jeanmariepascal >>> >>> >>> 2012/9/24 Florian Müller <[email protected]> >>> >>> > Hi everyone, >>> > >>> > What are your thoughts about a new OpenCMIS release? >>> > We have several unreleased features in SVN like Android support >>> and the >>> > OpenCMIS Bridge. The Browser Binding implementation has been >>> improved and >>> > is now completely following the CMIS 1.1 draft, which is now in >>> public >>> > review. And there have been several smaller fixes and >>> interoperability >>> > improvements. >>> > >>> > I think it is time to release OpenCMIS 0.8.0. >>> > >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Florian >>> > >>> > >>> >
