Hi,

I did have one question regarding the new *stop parameter, I’m just curious why 
the stop parameter was required when we already have a mechanism (via the 
CMISRequest object) to cancel running operations?

Thanks very much for adding secondary type support too, we were planning on 
doing that as well some point soon. I presume this was to support the 1.1 
binding? Do you know what else we need to do in order to support a 1.1 atom 
binding?

Finally, as I background project I have started looking at the browser binding, 
I have some *very* early support for the browser binding on my machine. I was 
thinking of creating a branch for this once the initial commit is ready as it 
is going to require some minor moving and renaming of files. Does any have any 
objection to the creation of a branch?

Regards,

Gavin



On 17 Mar 2014, at 15:36, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I fixed the project file (missing files) and added some fixes so that all 
> tests are green again.
> BTW: Please ignore my comment (below) about the incompatible changes (I've 
> made them some time ago) we currently still support the old interfaces, 
> however we can discuss if we want to get rid of them for 0.3 or if we want to 
> keep them for simple use cases.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Lukas
> 
> 
> From: <Gross>, Lukas Gross <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 3:02 PM
> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Commits to ObjectiveCMIS
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As announced earlier today we merged our changes (faster than I thought) and 
> committed them.
> Please have a close look to the changes as they also include an incompatible 
> API change: We added a *stop parameter to the progress block of all 
> transmission methods, so that it is possible to abort the transmission. We 
> decided against creating new interfaces with the *stop flag and just modified 
> the exiting ones as creating additional interfaces would basically double all 
> transmission interfaces.
> Please let us know if anyone has a different opinion on this topic.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Lukas

Reply via email to