On 3 April 2014 12:52, Florian Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > That makes an useful implementation difficult
I'd argue, that makes a *generic implementation* difficult, while a vendor specific extension is pretty easy to specify. In some cases (e.g. what in the AtomPub binding is mapped to PUT operations), it's trivial to provide a consistent (albeit vendor specific) semantic for If-Modified-Since even in the context of CMIS. As a legit HTTP extension, and as chemistry wraps HTTP, I would expect to be able to implement it. My question was among the lines of if and how chemistry provides hooks for such extensions to be built. Thanks, c. -- Carlo Sciolla Software Architect at Backbase - Next Generation Portal Software for Financials & Large Enterprises (http://www.backbase.com) --==(A)==-- Linux User #372086 My personal blog: http://www.skuro.tk Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/skuro <http://twitter.com/skuro>Fork me on Github: http://github.com/skuro <http://github.com/skuro>My LinkedIn profile: http://nl.linkedin.com/in/carlosciolla --==(A)==--
