Yes, we need to document this.
Thanks

regards,
Eric


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sreepathi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Looks like the following class was compiled with JDK 1.7 and hence the
> error, (when i tried compiling with JDK 1.6)
>
>  java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null: JVMCFRE003 bad major
> version; class=org/apache/solr/SolrJettyTestBase, offset=6
>
> Should we document the minimum requirements for maven and JDK in the
> readme.txt file?
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am using Maven 3.2.2 and Oracle JDK 1.7.0_25 on OSX.  The oldest
> version
> > of maven should be 3.0.5 or newer.  There was some breakage around 3.0.4
> > and need to clean maven cache to avoid Surefire 2.10 bugs.
> >
> > regards,
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Sreepathi <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ariel,
> > >
> > > I have Maven 3.0.3 and it works fine.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Sreepathi <
> > [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Readme needs to be updated to have chukwa 0.6 version.
> > > >
> > > > When I tried to run "mvn clean package", it fails with following
> error,
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.10:test
> (default-test)
> > > on
> > > > project chukwa: Execution default-test of goal
> > > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.10:test failed:
> > > > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
> > > > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null: JVMCFRE003 bad
> major
> > > > version; class=org/apache/solr/SolrJettyTestBase, offset=6
> > > >
> > > > This is with IBM JDK 6. Is it necessary, we should switch to Oracle
> > JDK ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ariel Rabkin <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Bah, hit sent before I meant to.
> > > >>
> > > >> Was going to say:
> > > >>
> > > >> Readme should reference 'mvn', not ant.
> > > >> And it bothers me a bit that the tests don't run for me.  Is this
> just
> > > >> me having a weird maven? Which versions work?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Ariel Rabkin <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > The readme says:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > "To check that things are ok, run 'ant test'. It should take
> roughly
> > > >> > fifteen minutes."
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > When I say
> > > >> > "mvn test", I get this error:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > >> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.10:test
> > > >> > (default-test) on project chukwa: Execution default-test of goal
> > > >> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.10:test failed:
> > > >> > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
> > > >> > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null:
> > > >> > org/apache/solr/SolrJettyTestBase : Unsupported major.minor
> version
> > > >> > 51.0 -> [Help 1]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Is that a blocker, do you think? Is there
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >> Hi folks,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I have put together a release candidate (rc0) for Chukwa 0.6.0.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The RC is available at:
> > > >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.6.0-rc0/
> > > >> >> The artifacts are available at:
> > > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.6.0-rc0/
> > > >> >> Site document is available at:
> > > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.6.0-rc0/site/
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Please try this release and vote.  The vote will run from now
> for 5
> > > >> days.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Thanks
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Regards,
> > > >> >> Eric
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Ari Rabkin
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Ari Rabkin
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Regards,*
> > > > --- *Sreepathi *
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Regards,*
> > > --- *Sreepathi *
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Regards,*
> --- *Sreepathi *
>

Reply via email to