Hi Reto, I already modified the existing implementation. Later I will post my changes and results. Now I am kind of in a hurry.
Regards Minto Op 8-3-2013 8:51, Reto Bachmann-Gmür schreef: > Not sure why this would relevantly increase performance. Access to set is > supposed to be fast. > This is not for performance reasons but for scalability. Especially for very large indexes it should not be required to keep the full index in memory all the time. In my implementation I chose to use a specific named graph for the index. It appear that it does increase performance in the long run, but that will be in my full report later. > Good, then let's optimize the clerezza perfomance. I think the Sparql > fastlane is an important step. Reto Like mentioned I already started. Also did some performance comparison between the single dataset provider and my modified version. Full report comes later. -- ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis Software innovator / renovator Xup BV Mobiel: +31 (0) 626 014541
