On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Op 2-5-2013 8:20, Reto Bachmann-Gmür schreef: > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>> - Adapt QueryEngine to take a String rather than a query > >> (No question) > >> I didn't Modify QueryEngine to String as I think using Query is more > >> elegant. > >> > > I agree for the elegance. The question is if we have the resources to > > update our parser when a new spec version comes out and does it bring any > > advantages or does it just cost in terms of computing as a string is > being > > parsed and serialized again? > > You're right, but then TcManager interface needs to be modified as well. > This would break backward compatibility. Maybe it is an option to just > add a executeSparqlQuery method which accepts a (query) string. In this > case the existing methods imply the overhead costs you mentioned. The > new string methods does not have this overhead. > > What do you think? > I'd suggest to first just deprecate the old method and note that they only support sparql 1.0. The methods could then be removed after the next release. Cheers, Reto > > > > Cheers, > > reto > > > > > -- > ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis > Software innovator / renovator > Xup BV > > Mobiel: +31 (0) 626 014541 > >
