Hi Tommaso, The modules all have proper version numbers. Nothing will depend on "20130710". As a partial relese there a throw-away reactor was used. Only this contains this version number.
We can of couse rediscus the release procedure. Preparing the rlease the main hindrance was http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MVERSIONS-85. Having this issue resolved would make things much easier, so please vote for it :) And yes, vote for the release too :) Cheers, Reto On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Reto, > > looks good to me (signatures, svn tag, tests passed, etc.), just why not > making it a 'more proper' version, for example simply 0.3? > > Regards, > Tommaso > > 2013/7/11 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> A lot of issues have been fixed recently. These include: >> - A first version of the Spaqrl Fastlane >> - A new Scala version >> - Update Jena >> >> The proposed releases contains the following modules: >> >> jaxrs.rdf.providers >> jaxrs.utils >> parent >> rdf.core >> rdf.core.test >> rdf.cris >> rdf.jena.commons >> rdf.jena.facade >> rdf.jena.parser >> rdf.jena.serializer >> rdf.jena.sparql >> rdf.jena.storage >> rdf.jena.tdb.storage >> rdf.web >> scala-scripting >> shell >> slf4j-scala-api >> >> The source zip and signature are here: >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-135/org/apache/clerezza/release20130710-reactor/0.3/ >> 6c2d3bfed208d1ade187b3c8ca9f2f03 >> release20130710-reactor-0.3-source-release.zip >> >> The Maven repository with the release candidate artifacts is here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-135/ >> >> The keys are here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/clerezza/KEYS >> >> >> The SVN tag is: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/clerezza/tags/release20130710-reactor-0.3/ >> >> >> This vote is open for at least 48 hours. >> >> >> Reto >>
