@Andy You're remark puzzles me. I know it's a quote from [1]. But is it to emphasize that I am correct or to tell me I'm incorrent?
dataset != transaction, but the example also shows that every thread has its own dataset. Regards, Minto Andy Seaborne schreef op 14-1-2014 10:45: > On 14/01/14 08:22, Minto van der Sluis wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> A reply [1] from Andy to one of my mails triggered me. I looked up the >> "serializable transactions" that Andy mentioned [2]. Especially the >> "Multi-threaded use" section caught my attention. If I read it correctly >> using a single dataset in multiple threads is discouraged. > > """ > While it is possible to share a *transaction* between multiple > threads, this is not encouraged. > """ > >> >> Looking at Clerezza's use of Jena's dataset I see no sign of >> multi-threading support. Might this be the cause of our >> ConcurrentModificationException perils? Am I on to something here? >> >> Please share your thoughts. >> >> Regards, >> >> Minto >> >> [1] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/clerezza-dev/201401.mbox/%3C52D41088.5070802%40apache.org%3E >> >> [2] http://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/tdb_transactions.html >> >> > > > -- ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis Software innovator / renovator Xup BV Mobiel: +31 (0) 626 014541
