Hi Reto, all On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Hasan, all, > > So today I did quite some changes that are think are good to have in the > release. > - Some fixes around System graph and documentation > - Some changes so that our bundles have less dependencies (CLEREZZA-844 is > still open) > - Resolved the SKOS08/04 issue as suggested by Rupert > > Thanks for all of these. > Now for the release: > > One option would be to release all. This would mean all bundles have a > post-incubating release. For this we probably would want to remove the > obsolete ext.org.apache.jena[.tdb] projects. A downside of this approach is > that the new version (of the tdb based launcher) will have some features > missing that were there in the incubating version (most notably the > authentication methods other than basic). > I think it's better to keep those features available for the moment. So I would not opt for this option. > > Another approach is to release what's in the bundlelists. The bundlelists > are all in the provisioning folder[1]. We could release them all together, > the feature-project alongside with all their dependency. This should be > self-contained (an exception might be some dependency with scope test. > > We could also release the bundlelists/features one by one or in batches. > For example in the following order: > > 0) parent (yes, that's no a feature) > 1) felixosgi > 2) felixweb > 3) rdf > 4) shell (optionally with launchers/shell-launcher) > 5) platform.graphnodeprovider > 6) jaxrs-whiteboard * > 7) typerendering (optionally with launchers/typerendering-launcher) > 8) typehandlerspace > 9) rdf.web > 10) platform.content (optionally with launchers/linked-data-launcher and/or > full-launcher) > I agree with this approach. I tend to release them in batches rather than all together. > > * I've just noticed that this relied on some Stanbol 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT for the > Jersey 2.0 Jax-RS support. So we should either get stanbol to release those > bundles (which might be a bit hard as the 0.12 release is still on the way, > and a full 1.0.0 stanbol would in turn require clerezza to release some > bundles) or provide replacement for those bundles (easy and justified as > clerezza doesn't need the whole stanbol web support but only JAX-RS > whiteboard). > > Ok, so to summarize:all the information on what can be release together > should be there,if it's not clear then I should fix this. > > My proposal: We release feature by feature. Somebody other than me > coordinates the release. (1 and 2 are a very easy staring point as they > have no clerezza dependencies). I take care about the * so once we are at 6 > things are ready. > > WDYT? > @all: I think we don't need to vote on this approach. Otherwise please shout. Ok. I can take care of 0, 1, 2 and 3. I would need your support if there are problems. Please volunteer to help here taking care of other features. Cheers Hasan > > Reto > > 1. > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=clerezza.git;a=tree;f=provisioning;h=0dee59767bed0958c900f38f5c2af27714de235b;hb=HEAD > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Reto, all > > > > @Reto: Could you please organize the releases? I think you know the best > > what bundles, features, partialbundlelists which are ready. > > > > Cheers > > Hasan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Part of the motivation of creating the bundlelits/features was also to > > see > > > the dependencies between the bundles more clearly and thus facilitate > > > releases. I thought the bundlelists could also be the basis for making > a > > > more hierarchical project structure. The creation of bundlelists showed > > > that the shell has a lot of dependencies that should be avoided for > > keeping > > > it portable (CLEREZZA-844). It has also shown that because of > > > GraphNodeProvider in not split from its implementation (CLEREZZA-838) > > > TypeRendering and TypeHandlerSpace have quite some avoidable platform > > > dependencies. > > > > > > The creation of bundlelists is not yet finished. Nevertheless the ones > > that > > > are there some show some sets of of bundles that can be released > > together. > > > The maven project description states on which other bundlelists a > > > bundlelist depends on. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Reto > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Actually I had it on my todo list for quite some time. But haven't > > found > > > > yet the time to do so. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Minto > > > > > > > > Enrico Daga schreef op 11-2-2014 10:48: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11 February 2014 08:49, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > > >> > > > > >> also adds the bundlelists. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Tommaso Teofili > > > > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Tommaso > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> 2014-02-11 0:58 GMT+01:00 Hasan Hasan <[email protected]>: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Hi all > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I think it's high time to prepare a new release in the next two > > > three > > > > >>>> months after we have made some valuable contributions in the > past > > 6 > > > > >>> months. > > > > >>>> What can we release next? Some suggestions: > > > > >>>> - rdf.core > > > > >>>> - platform.content > > > > >>>> - storage (virtuoso) > > > > >>>> - ... > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> WDYT? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Regards > > > > >>>> Hasan > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis > > > > Software innovator / renovator > > > > Xup BV > > > > > > > > Mobiel: +31 (0) 626 014541 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
