On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/09/15 18:39, Reto Gmür wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 05/09/15 16:36, Reto Gmür wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This is a partial clerezza release of 23 modules bringing the following >>>> improvements: >>>> >>>> - Fixed issues preventing rdf.rdfjson and rdf.jena.sparql to expose >>>> their >>>> OSGi-DS services >>>> - Updated to latest version of Jersey >>>> - Updated Jena Version >>>> - Contains integration tests >>>> >>>> It contains the following artifacts that shall be released to maven >>>> central: >>>> >>>> >>> Where are the convenience binaries? (I didn't see anything on >>> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories but may have missed >>> something) >>> >> >> Enabled now. Here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009/ >> > > Could you have used Jena's OSGi artifact? > No, the jena bundles package everything in a single bundle which is not what we need as not all launchers need TDB. We changed from a monolotyc Jena bundle aproach to the more modular approach with Minto's contribution a while ago. Of course it would be good if the jena jars could become OSGi bundles by default, but I'm not sure if the circular dependencies that used to prevent doing this are still there. Also we had some issues getting things to run: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-users/201501.mbox/%3ccalvhuewk+4exetrx4a4huopkagnbcnsnx6x2sw1ae9ru8nh...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > The binaries have had the NOTICE and LICENSE files replaced in both jar > and sources.jar. These miss the necessary declarations. > I don't think anything changed here. Do you think something need to be changed for the release candidate to be acceptable (the vote is on the source zip linked in the original mail). Cheers, Reto
